COVNA Offering All Kinds Of Actuator Valves For Your Choice

WhatsApp

CONTACT US

NEWS

You are here: Home » News » Valve Knowledge » Lug vs Wafer Butterfly Valves: A Technical Comparison of Design, Performance, and Applications
Hot Articles
Contact Us

Lug vs Wafer Butterfly Valves: A Technical Comparison of Design, Performance, and Applications

Views: 0     Author: Site Editor     Publish Time: 2025-03-21      Origin: Site

Introduction

Butterfly valves are critical for flow control in pipelines, but selecting between lug and wafer types can profoundly impact system efficiency. This guide analyzes their structural differences, pressure capabilities, and ideal use cases, supported by engineering standards and empirical data.


1. Fundamental Structural Differences


COVNA Wafer Butterfly Valves



Wafer Butterfly Valves


Design:

  ▪️No threaded lugs on the valve body

  ▪️Secured via compression between two pipeline flanges using through-bolts

  ▪️Compact profile (30-40% thinner than lug valves)

Key Component:

  ▪️Resilient seat (typically EPDM or NBR) bonded to the valve body

Installation Limitation:

  ▪️"Wafer valves require precise flange alignment – even 2mm misalignment can reduce seal lifespan by 60%."

  — ASME B16.34 Installation Guidelines



COVNA Lug Butterfly Valves



Lug Butterfly Valves


Design:

  ▪️Integrally cast threaded lugs (ears) on both valve body sides

  ▪️Allows independent bolting to each flange (4-8 bolts per side)

  ▪️Pipeline flanges remain connected during valve removal

Key Component:

  ▪️Reinforced lug threads (common materials: ASTM A536 ductile iron or 316L SS)

Critical Standard:

  ▪️API 609 mandates minimum lug thickness as 1.25× valve body wall thickness for pressure containment.



2. Performance Comparison: 5 Critical Factors

Parameter Wafer Valve Lug Valve
Max Pressure 150 PSI (10 bar) Unidirectional 300 PSI (20 bar) Bidirectional
Temperature Range -20°C to 120°C (EPDM seat) -40°C to 200°C (Multi-layer metal + elastomer seals)
Flow Direction Unidirectional (flow arrow marked) Bidirectional (no flow restrictions)
Maintenance Full system shutdown required Single-side removal for inline servicing
Lifespan 50,000 cycles (ISO 5752 standard) 100,000+ cycles (API 609 standard)



3. When to Choose Each Type

4 Scenarios Favoring Wafer Valves

  1. Space-Constrained Systems

    • Ideal for flange gaps < valve length + 10mm

    • Example: Ceiling-mounted HVAC ducts

  2. Low-Pressure Unidirectional Fluids

    • Water/air systems ≤ 10 bar

    • Avoid pulsating flows or frequent cycling

  3. Cost-Sensitive Projects

    • 35-40% lower upfront cost vs lug valves

    • Note: Higher total ownership cost (TCO) possible

  4. Rapid Installation Needs

    • DN150 wafer valve installation ≈ 18 minutes

    • (vs 25 minutes for lug valves)

5 Mandatory Applications for Lug Valves

  1. Bidirectional Sealing

    • Fire protection systems, chemical recirculation lines

  2. Medium/High-Pressure Systems

    • Pressure > 10 bar or with fluctuations

  3. Frequent Maintenance

    • Enables single-side disassembly without system shutdown

  4. High-Vibration Environments

    • Lugs withstand >5G vibration (MIL-STD-810G compliant)

Lug vs Wafer Butterfly Valves A Technical Comparison of Design, Performance, and Applications-1


4. Common Technical Misconceptions

Myth 1: “Lug valves are just heavier wafer valves”

Reality:

  • Structural differences exceed weight:

    • Lug valve discs are 50% thicker for bidirectional pressure

    • Stem diameter 20-30% larger (prevents torsion failure)

    • Multi-layer seals (EPDM + stainless steel reinforcement)

Myth 2: “Wafer valves can be retrofitted for bidirectional use”

Risk Analysis:

  • Reverse pressure causes:

    • Disc misalignment ≥0.5mm → 80% higher leakage

    • Stem shear stress overload → fracture risk

  • Case Study: $220,000 leakage incident from modified wafer valves in a power plant

Lug vs Wafer Butterfly Valves A Technical Comparison of Design, Performance, and Applications-3


5. Compliance & Certifications

Standard Wafer Valve Compliance Lug Valve Compliance
Basic ISO 5752 API 609 / EN 593
Fire Protection Not applicable NFPA 13 / UL 668
Food/Pharma 3-A SSI (specific models only) EHEDG + FDA 21 CFR
High-Pressure N/A ASME B16.34 Class 150



6. Technical Specifications Comparison


Specification COVNA Wafer Valve COVNA Lug Valve
Body Material ASTM A536 Ductile Iron ASTM A995 4A Ductile Iron
Seat Material EPDM (standard) Triple-layer: PTFE+EPDM+SS
Shaft Design Single-stage Tapered reinforcement (anti-vibration)
Leakage Class Class A (ISO 5208) Class D (API 598)
Operational Cycles 50,000 150,000

Lug vs Wafer Butterfly Valves A Technical Comparison of Design, Performance, and Applications-2



7. Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Can I convert a wafer valve to a lug-style valve?
A: Technically impossible. Structural design, sealing systems, and pressure validation differ entirely. Retrofit violates ASME BPE standards.

Q2: Why are lug valves more expensive?
A: Cost differences stem from:

  • 25-30% more material usage

  • Additional machining (lug thread tolerance ≤±0.05mm)

  • 2× longer bidirectional seal testing

Q3: How to quickly identify valve types?
A: Two-step method:

  1. Check for threaded lugs on the valve body

  2. Review nameplate standards: API 609 = lug, ISO 5752 = wafer


Conclusion & Action Guide

Understanding core differences prevents systemic risks:

  • Wafer Valves: Economical for unidirectional, low-pressure systems

  • Lug Valves: Essential for bidirectional sealing, high-pressure, and maintenance flexibility

COVNA Expert Support:

  • Free Valve Selection Technical Memo (includes ASME calculation templates)

  • Engineering team available for pipeline drawing reviews and validation

Download technical resources or consult our fluid engineers today:
Download Product Catalog   Request Custom Quote/Live Technical Chat


Contact
  +86-17317982006
  +86-17317982006
  sales@covnav.com
  sales@covnav.com
 Longchang Micro-Changyuan, Dongcheng District Dongguan City, China
Explore
Support
Follow Us
Copyright © 2025 COVNA | Powered by COVNA